This post appeared in Truck News September, 2014
With all the reports out of Germany in early July regarding Daimlers driverless trucks I can’t help but throw in my own two cents on this topic as a full time driver.
With all the reports out of Germany in early July regarding Daimlers driverless trucks I can’t help but throw in my own two cents on this topic as a full time driver.
We all know that the majority of collisions on our roads are
caused by driver error. Automation can eliminate fatigued driving, distracted
driving, speeding, and other bad driving habits. If safety were the sole
motivator of vehicle automation we would all be embracing the technology. But
of course safety is only one factor albeit an important one. When technology
impacts our personal lives and changes how we live, work, and play then the
issue becomes murky.
So what about productivity gains? The first thing that comes
to mind is improved fuel mileage. I was surprised that Daimler stated this
technology would mean an immediate gain of 5% in fuel mileage. Five percent?
Really? That’s it? I have no idea how Daimler calculated this but research has
shown that drivers can impact fuel economy by as much as 20% according to some
of the Fleetsmart training material I’ve been exposed to. I’ll assume that Daimler’s
numbers are gains above their current fuel mileage standards of vehicles driven
to specification, something that doesn’t happen all of the time in real world
application. So I think trucking companies would realise much better gains in
fuel economy with automated trucks. In this regard is automation much different
than imposing speed limiters on the industry since a driver would always be
behind the wheel? Would it be accepted by current drivers any differently than
speed limiters have been?
What do you think about this quote taken from the pages of
Truck News on July 3? “Daimler demonstrates self-driving trucks”
“Autonomous driving
will inevitably also change the job profile of truck drivers,” said Dr. Ing.
Klaus Ruff. “They will gain time for other activities than just driving the
truck: office work, social interaction, and relaxation periods. Autonomous
driving will make the driver’s working time more varied and less stressful, and
help to make long-distance driving more attractive as a profession.”
Okay so first of all let’s look at the concept of office
work while on the road. Are we to become driver / dispatcher / load planner?
Perhaps we are. There are great efficiencies and costs to be gained here but
it’s not what I signed up for, how about you?
On social interaction? I spend 120 hours per week in my
truck. I drive it, eat in it, and sleep in it. In an automated truck I would
still be doing the same. Social interaction would come through electronic media
which gets old in a hurry.
Relaxation periods? Those happen outside the normal working
environment. Just because I don’t have to pay attention to the road does not
necessarily equate with relaxation time. The greatest stresses we face as
drivers result from the amount of time we spend on the road not from how we
spend that time on the road.
For me relaxation and social interaction happen when I am at
home away from the everyday responsibilities of the job and not in care and
control of my vehicle. That care and control happens whether I am on duty or
not. I’m not clear on exactly how my working time will become less stressful if
you were to turn over some of my driving responsibilities to an automated
truck, replace them with some “office work” but still leave me with 100% of the
responsibility for the operation of that truck while it’s rolling down the
road. After all I would still be the driver of record in the seat, right?
How would all of this equate to our profession becoming more
attractive? I’m not clear on that. Why would someone want to sit in a truck for
all of those hours doing the work they could do at home on a tablet unless they
were paid an above average income? They wouldn’t. If automation is about
efficiency how is this attractive in any way? It’s not. It’s just a stepping
stone to automated driverless trucks. That’s where the real cost savings and
improved safety lie. The driver is the weak link here and I don’t think we
should lose sight of that fact.
This is a contentious opinion, I know, but where else does
automation lead in regard to cost control? We only have to look around to see
how labour intensive positions are being made increasingly redundant through
technology. This has been going on for decades now and it is not going to abate
anytime in the near future.
There is no doubt in my mind that automated trucks that
eventually lead to driverless trucks is a good thing for our society on many
fronts. At the same time it leads to the redundancy of millions of middle class
jobs from the marketplace across North America.
We certainly have no final word on this topic.
No comments:
Post a Comment